Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee established sufficient cause under rule 117A for waiver of interest levied for late filing of the return, and whether the Commissioner's refusal to interfere in revision under section 264 called for interference.
Analysis: The return for the assessment year was filed after the due date, and interest under section 139(8) was levied. In revision, the assessee relied on the illness of its munim for a period ending well before the due date. The Commissioner accepted the certificate of illness but held that, even on that footing, there was ample time thereafter to file the return within time. The reasons recorded were treated as relevant, genuine, and based on the material on record, and no failure to consider the relevant facts was shown.
Conclusion: The assessee did not establish sufficient cause for waiver of interest, and the Commissioner's order under section 264 did not warrant interference.
Final Conclusion: The writ petition challenging the refusal to waive interest failed and was dismissed.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the authority accepts the factual basis pleaded for delay but finds that sufficient time still remained to comply with the statutory due date, refusal to waive interest cannot be interfered with unless the decision is shown to be irrelevant, perverse, or lacking consideration of material facts.