Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether cenvat credit was admissible on services availed at the installation site in relation to turnkey supply and installation contracts.
Analysis: Admissibility of credit depended on whether the contracts were truly turnkey arrangements in which installation, erection, freight and transit insurance formed part of the contracted value so that the installation site could be treated as the point of sale. The existing record showed that credit had been allowed for some entries, but the remaining contracts and invoices did not conclusively establish that all relevant cost elements were included in the contract price. The correct course was therefore to verify the contractual terms and supporting invoices against the CBEC circular governing such cases.
Conclusion: The issue was not finally decided on merits and required factual verification by the original adjudicating authority.
Final Conclusion: The appellate order was set aside and the matter was returned for fresh decision after examining the contracts and invoices and granting hearing to the appellant.
Ratio Decidendi: Where admissibility of cenvat credit turns on whether a contract is a true turnkey contract and the factual record is incomplete, the matter must be remanded for verification of the contractual value and supporting documents before credit can be determined.