Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether rental compensation payable for requisitioned land accrued year to year from the date of requisition or was taxable only in the year of lump-sum receipt.
Analysis: The right to compensation arose under section 8 of the Bombay Land Requisition Act, 1948, on deprivation of possession and was governed by the compensation scheme under Rule 4 of the Bombay Land Requisition (Determination of Compensation) Rules, 1949. The compensation was thus a recurring yearly accrual, and the later quantification or part payment did not alter the character of the income. On the principle that an absolute and vested right to receive compensation gives rise to accrual when the right arises, the amount could not be assessed on receipt basis merely because it was paid in part later in a lump sum. The reasoning was consistent with the principle that compensation-related income accrues annually and is taxable proportionately in the relevant years.
Conclusion: The compensation was taxable on accrual year to year and not as income of the year of receipt; the answer is in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: Where compensation for requisitioned property gives rise to a vested right to receive a recurring annual amount, the income accrues year to year and is assessable on accrual basis notwithstanding later quantification or lump-sum payment.