Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a registered firm can carry forward unabsorbed loss to subsequent years and whether such loss must instead be apportioned among the partners for set-off under the relevant provisions of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Analysis: Section 75 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was treated as the controlling provision. Its language was read as making a registered firm's right to claim loss relief restrictive: where the firm's loss cannot be set off against its other income, the loss is to be apportioned between the partners, who alone are entitled to set it off and carry it forward under sections 70, 71, 72, 73, 74 and 74A. On that construction, the firm itself is excluded from carrying forward its own unabsorbed loss. The contrary view taken in the Madras High Court decisions was declined in view of the clear wording of section 75.
Conclusion: A registered firm can set off its loss against income of the same year but cannot carry forward the unabsorbed loss to subsequent years; the issue is answered in favour of the Revenue.