Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether relief under section 50 of the Estate Duty Act, 1953 could be denied merely because additional court-fees for probate were paid after the estate duty assessment had been completed, and whether such relief was barred by section 61 of the Act.
Analysis: Section 50 creates a statutory obligation to reduce estate duty by the amount of court-fees paid under the relevant court-fees law for obtaining probate, letters of administration, or succession certificate. The provision does not prescribe any period of limitation, and the timing of the estate duty assessment does not defeat the substantive right to relief when further court-fees become payable later. The Court rejected the contrary view and treated the relief as dependent on the actual fact of payment of court-fees, not on whether the assessment had already been finalised. The Court also relied on the Board circular accepting this position, which was binding on officers administering the Act.
Conclusion: Relief under section 50 could not be refused on the ground that the assessment had already been completed or that section 61 was unavailable for rectification. The petitioner was entitled to refund of the additional court-fees amount by way of estate duty relief.