Revenue's Late Appeal Admitted on Valid Grounds; Disallowance Deleted, TDS Verification Ordered

The Revenue's appeal against the CIT(A) order, filed late by 4 days, was admitted by the tribunal due to valid reasons for the delay. The tribunal confirmed the deletion of disallowance for short deduction under section 40(a)(ia) amounting to Rs. 45,530,517. For the remaining amount of Rs. 5,071,483, the tribunal directed the AO to verify if TDS was deposited before the due date of filing the return, with instructions for appropriate additions if necessary. The tribunal emphasized the retrospective application of amended provisions and partially allowed the Revenue's appeal for statistical purposes.

---

---

Issues:
1. Late filing of appeal by Revenue against CIT(A) order.
2. Disallowance made u/s 40(a)(ia) of the IT Act.
3. Verification of TDS deduction and payment timelines.

Analysis:
1. The Revenue filed an appeal against the CIT(A) order, which was late by 4 days. The Revenue provided valid reasons for the delay, which were accepted by the tribunal, and the appeal was admitted.

2. The disallowance u/s 40(a)(ia) of the IT Act was contested by the assessee. The disallowance consisted of two types of defaults: short deduction and non-deduction of TDS. The tribunal noted that the provisions of section 40(a)(ia) require deduction and payment of tax to the government account. The tribunal relied on the decision of the Calcutta High Court, which clarified that a shortfall in deduction does not automatically make the assessee a defaulter. The tribunal confirmed the deletion of disallowance for short deduction amounting to Rs. 45,530,517.

3. Regarding the balance amount of Rs. 5,071,483, the assessee contended that TDS was deducted and paid before the due date of filing the return u/s 139(1) of the IT Act. The tribunal referred to the decision of the Calcutta High Court, which recognized the amendments in section 40(a)(ia) by the Finance Act, 2010, as curative and remedial. The tribunal directed the AO to verify if the TDS was deposited before the due date of filing the return. If verified, the disallowance of Rs. 5,071,483 was to be deleted; otherwise, the AO was instructed to make additions accordingly.

4. The tribunal emphasized that the decisions of the Mumbai and Ahmedabad Benches, along with the Calcutta High Court, supported the retrospective application of the amended provisions of section 40(a)(ia). The tribunal concluded by partially allowing the Revenue's appeal for statistical purposes, based on the above analysis and directions provided for verification by the AO.

---