Taxability and commodity classification disputes may be referred for clarification, with assessment kept in abeyance pending the ruling.

Disputes on whether tax is payable on a commodity, and on its classification, fall within the clarification mechanism under the Kerala Value Added Tax Act where the authority is empowered to determine taxability, the point of levy and the rate of tax. The petitioner's request for clarification on the commodity's classification was therefore treated as suitable for that forum. To allow the clarification to be obtained and placed before the assessing authority, the assessment process was directed to remain in abeyance for two months.

---

---

Issues: Whether the dispute regarding taxability and classification of the commodity should be pursued through the clarification mechanism under the Kerala Value Added Tax Act, and whether the assessment proceedings should be kept in abeyance pending such clarification.

Analysis: The dispute related to whether any tax was payable on the commodity sold by the petitioner, which fell within the scope of the clarification authority constituted under Section 94. That provision covers disputes concerning whether tax is payable and, if so, the point and rate of tax. The petitioner's request for determination of the commodity's classification was therefore considered apt for resolution by that authority. To enable the petitioner to obtain and place the clarification before the assessing authority, a short suspension of the assessment process was warranted.

Conclusion: The petitioner was permitted to approach the authority under Section 94 for clarification, and the assessment proceedings were directed to remain in abeyance for two months.

---