Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the seized shares and instruction slip books could be released to the petitioner and the orders of the Magistrate and revisional court refusing such release were liable to be quashed.
Analysis: The property in question had been seized during investigation and was sought under the provision governing custody and disposal of seized property. The accused had raised no objection to release in favour of the petitioner, and the Income Tax Department, after inquiry, reported that no further action was warranted and did not press for continued custody of the materials for its investigation. In these circumstances, the seized instruction slip books and the shares represented in the demat accounts were not required to remain under detention, though any further dealing with the shares could be regulated by the trial court through appropriate safeguards.
Conclusion: The refusal to release the seized property was unsustainable, and the petitioner was entitled to handover of the instruction slip books and transfer of the shares on suitable conditions.
Ratio Decidendi: Seized property may be released to the claimant when it is no longer for investigation and the proposed release can be protected by suitable conditions imposed by the court.