Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2013 (4) TMI 62 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tribunal overturns Income Tax assessment under section 263, citing impermissible change of opinion The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, finding that the order passed under section 263 of the Income Tax Act was not erroneous in various ...
                        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                            Tribunal overturns Income Tax assessment under section 263, citing impermissible change of opinion

                            The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, finding that the order passed under section 263 of the Income Tax Act was not erroneous in various aspects including the treatment of interest liabilities, accrued interest, and exchange rate differences. The Tribunal held that the Commissioner of Income Tax's intervention constituted a change of opinion, impermissible under legal precedents, and accepted the assessee's claims regarding the retention amount.




                            Issues:

                            1. Validity of order passed under section 263 of the Income Tax Act.
                            2. Treatment of interest liability pertaining to a loan from GIIC.
                            3. Treatment of accrued interest shown as unpaid in the balance sheet.
                            4. Change of opinion by the Commissioner of Income Tax.
                            5. Acceptance of retention amount not accounted by the assessee.
                            6. Addition of exchange rate difference on outstanding amount.

                            Issue 1: Validity of order passed under section 263 of the Income Tax Act

                            The appeal pertains to an order passed by the Ld. CIT-I, Baroda under section 263 of the Income Tax Act. The Ld. AO had completed the assessment, making gross additions and allowing carried forward losses. The counsel for the assessee contended that the order passed under section 263 was invalid as all issues had been considered during the assessment proceedings. The Ld. CIT observed discrepancies related to a loan from GIIC and accrued interest, but it was argued that these had been duly addressed by the assessee. The Tribunal found that the AO's order was not erroneous to the extent that the interest had already been added back by the appellant in the computation of income.

                            Issue 2: Treatment of interest liability pertaining to a loan from GIIC

                            The Ld. CIT observed that a sum pertaining to a loan from GIIC was claimed as a deduction under section 43 B of the Income Tax Act, but the interest liability was not added back as required. The A.R. argued that the full amount had been added back in the computation of income by the assessee. The Tribunal verified this and found that the interest had indeed been added back, concluding that the AO's order was not erroneous in this regard.

                            Issue 3: Treatment of accrued interest shown as unpaid in the balance sheet

                            The Ld. CIT noted that interest accrued but unpaid was shown in the balance sheet, and since the loan advance and interest due had been converted into a term loan, the interest was not actually paid and thus not admissible under section 43B of the Income Tax Act. The counsel for the appellant argued that this aspect had been considered by the AO, who did not make any addition after reviewing the reply. The Tribunal held that the CIT's order on this issue amounted to a change of opinion, which is impermissible under the law.

                            Issue 4: Change of opinion by the Commissioner of Income Tax

                            The Tribunal emphasized that the CIT's order under section 263, which was based on issues already considered by the AO, constituted a change of opinion, which is not allowed under legal precedents set by various high courts. It was established that the AO had issued a show cause notice on the matter, and the assessee had filed a reply, indicating that the CIT's intervention was unwarranted.

                            Issue 5: Acceptance of retention amount not accounted by the assessee

                            The Commissioner of Income-tax had directed the AO regarding a retention amount not accounted for by the assessee. Subsequently, the rectification order was passed, accepting the assessee's claim. The counsel for the assessee did not press this issue, indicating acceptance of the decision in their favor.

                            Issue 6: Addition of exchange rate difference on outstanding amount

                            The Ld. CIT directed the addition of an exchange rate difference on the outstanding amount, citing discrepancies in the treatment of foreign currency transactions. The Tribunal reviewed the facts and arguments presented, ultimately concluding that the exchange rate fluctuations were allowable as revenue expenditure, in line with relevant legal precedents. The appeal of the assessee was allowed in this regard.

                            In conclusion, the Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, addressing various issues related to the validity of the order under section 263, treatment of interest liabilities, accrued interest, change of opinion, acceptance of claims, and exchange rate differences, providing detailed analysis and legal reasoning for each aspect.
                            Full Summary is available for active users!
                            Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                            Topics

                            ActsIncome Tax
                            No Records Found