Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Cenvat credit could be allowed on the basis of duplicate copies and photocopies of invoices when the documents were not verified or attested and the head office was not registered as an input service distributor.
Analysis: Rule 9(1) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 permits credit only on valid documents such as invoices, bills or challans issued by the input service provider or input service distributor. Duplicate copies produced by the appellant were not certified or verified by the jurisdictional central excise officer, and photocopies taken from one original invoice raised the possibility of credit being availed more than once on the same document. The head office was not registered as an input service distributor during the relevant period, and the original invoices were not produced before the authorities.
Conclusion: Cenvat credit on duplicate copies and photocopies of invoices was not admissible and was rightly disallowed.
Final Conclusion: The appeal failed and the denial of Cenvat credit was sustained.
Ratio Decidendi: Cenvat credit cannot be availed on unverified duplicate copies or photocopies of invoices unless the documents are duly authenticated and the statutory requirements for valid credit documents are satisfied.