Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, in the light of the prima facie view on admissibility of Modvat credit on input services used for construction of residential units for employees and the amount already deposited, the balance pre-deposit ought to be dispensed with.
Analysis: The appeal involved a demand confirmed by denying credit on input services relating to construction of staff residential units. The Tribunal noted that one High Court decision supported the assessee's case by treating the staff colony as intrinsically connected with manufacturing activity, while another decision took a contrary view. At the interim stage, the Tribunal treated the issue as prima facie covered in favour of the assessee. It also took note of the amount already deposited and considered it sufficient for the purposes of waiver of the remaining pre-deposit requirement under Section 35F.
Conclusion: The balance pre-deposit of duty, interest and penalty was dispensed with and stay was granted in favour of the assessee.