Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI OCR

Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2013 (2) TMI 324 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Business loss, section 50C valuation, and unexplained cash credit: tribunal analysis on deduction and property sale receipts An irrecoverable exhibition-related payment made in the ordinary course of business was not deductible as a bad debt under the cash system, but it ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Business loss, section 50C valuation, and unexplained cash credit: tribunal analysis on deduction and property sale receipts

                          An irrecoverable exhibition-related payment made in the ordinary course of business was not deductible as a bad debt under the cash system, but it qualified as a business loss because it arose from an actual business transaction and became unrecoverable due to the principal's financial distress. Where the assessee disputed the stamp valuation under section 50C and supported the objection with an approved valuer's report, the Assessing Officer was required to follow the statutory mechanism and refer the matter for valuation before adopting the stamp value. Sale proceeds of a flat supported by a sale agreement could not be treated as unexplained cash credit under section 68 because the receipt was traceable to an identified property transaction.




                          Issues: (i) Whether the non-recoverable exhibition expenditure written off could be disallowed as bad debt but allowed as business loss despite the assessee following cash system of accounting. (ii) Whether, where the assessee objects to the stamp valuation, a reference to the Valuation Officer is required under section 50C. (iii) Whether the sale proceeds of a flat could be treated as unexplained cash credit under section 68 when supported by the sale agreement.

                          Issue (i): Whether the non-recoverable exhibition expenditure written off could be disallowed as bad debt but allowed as business loss despite the assessee following cash system of accounting.

                          Analysis: The amount was incurred by the assessee in the course of its regular business practice on behalf of principals for exhibition-related activities. It was not allowable as bad debt because the assessee followed cash system of accounting and the amount did not satisfy the statutory conditions for deduction as a debt. However, the loss arose from a business transaction already undertaken in the course of carrying on the business, and became ascertained only when recovery from the principal became impossible due to financial distress and termination of the joint venture.

                          Conclusion: The write-off was not allowable as bad debt, but it was allowable as business loss in favour of the assessee.

                          Issue (ii): Whether, where the assessee objects to the stamp valuation, a reference to the Valuation Officer is required under section 50C.

                          Analysis: Once the assessee disputes the value adopted by the stamp valuation authority and substantiates the objection with an approved valuer's report, the Assessing Officer cannot mechanically adopt the stamp value. The scheme of section 50C requires determination of fair market value in the manner provided by subsection (2), and the power to refer the matter is to be exercised in accordance with that statutory mandate.

                          Conclusion: The matter was required to be referred to the Valuation Officer and the issue was restored to the Assessing Officer in favour of the assessee.

                          Issue (iii): Whether the sale proceeds of a flat could be treated as unexplained cash credit under section 68 when supported by the sale agreement.

                          Analysis: The assessee produced the sale agreement showing receipt of consideration on transfer of the property. Once the receipt was traceable to an identified sale transaction, it could not be characterised as an unexplained credit. The contrary view taken in assessment and appellate proceedings was unsustainable.

                          Conclusion: The addition under section 68 was deleted in favour of the assessee.

                          Final Conclusion: The assessee succeeded on the business-loss claim and on the section 68 addition, while the section 50C issue was remitted for fresh determination, leaving the appeals partly allowed overall.

                          Ratio Decidendi: A loss arising from an irrecoverable business-related payment made in the ordinary course of trade may be deductible as business loss when recovery becomes impossible, and where the assessee objects to stamp valuation under section 50C, fair market value must be determined in the statutory manner before adopting the stamp value.


                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found