TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Join Channel
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the petitioner's refund claim under Notification No. 102/2007-Customs should be adjudicated in the writ petition or left for consideration by the departmental authority.
Analysis: The relief sought was for refund of the additional duty paid by the petitioner under the notification. The Court did not enter into the merits of the refund claim and instead directed the third respondent to consider and dispose of the representation in accordance with law within the stipulated time.
Conclusion: The petitioner's substantive refund claim was not decided in the writ petition. The matter was directed to be considered by the competent authority.
TaxTMI 
