Just a moment...
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, for goods cleared without payment of duty under Notification No. 6/2006-CE, the restrictions under Rule 6 of the CENVAT Credit Rules applied so as to deny the assessee the benefit of Notification No. 67/95-CE and justify insistence on pre-deposit.
Analysis: The clearance of goods under Notification No. 6/2006-CE attracted the exclusion in Rule 6(6) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, with the result that the requirements under Rule 6(1) to Rule 6(4), including maintenance of separate accounts for exempted goods, did not arise. On the available record, no failure to comply with any obligation under Rule 6 was shown. In that prima facie view, the assessee was not in violation of condition (vii) of Notification No. 67/95-CE and the exemption could not be denied at the stay stage.
Conclusion: The issue was decided in favour of the assessee, and pre-deposit of the dues was waived with recovery stayed during pendency of the appeals.