TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Companies Act: Court Approves Scheme of Amalgamation</h1> <h3>PERFECT RADIATORS AND OIL COOLERS PVT LTD. Versus LLOYD ELECTRIC AND ENGINEERING LTD.</h3> PERFECT RADIATORS AND OIL COOLERS PVT LTD. Versus LLOYD ELECTRIC AND ENGINEERING LTD. - TMI Issues:1. Application under Sections 391 & 394 of the Companies Act, 1956 for Scheme of Amalgamation.2. Jurisdiction of the Court over the Applicant and Transferee Companies.3. Approval of the proposed Scheme by the Board of Directors.4. Consent of Shareholders, Secured Creditors, and Unsecured Creditors for the Scheme.5. Dispensation of the requirement to convene meetings of Shareholders, Secured Creditors, and Unsecured Creditors.Analysis:1. The judgment pertains to a first motion Application under Sections 391 & 394 of the Companies Act, 1956 regarding a Scheme of Amalgamation. The Applicant Company's registered office is in Delhi, under the jurisdiction of the Delhi High Court. The Transferee Company's registered office is in Bhiwari, Alwar District, Rajasthan, with relevant proceedings conducted as per an order from the High Court of Rajasthan. No pending proceedings under Sections 235 to 251 of the Act against the Applicant Company were noted.2. The jurisdiction of the Court was established over both the Applicant and Transferee Companies. The approval of the proposed Scheme by the Board of Directors of the Applicant Company was confirmed. The status of Shareholders, Secured Creditors, and Unsecured Creditors, along with their consents for the Scheme, was detailed in a chart provided with the application. The chart outlined the number of stakeholders, consents obtained, and relevant page numbers for reference.3. Based on the information presented in the chart, it was noted that the requirement to convene meetings of Shareholders, Secured Creditors, and Unsecured Creditors of the Transferor Company was dispensed with. Consequently, the Application was allowed in the stated terms, and an order was issued accordingly. The judgment was delivered by Indermeet Kaur, J., with the order to be issued dasti, indicating immediate action.This detailed analysis covers the key issues addressed in the judgment, providing a comprehensive overview of the legal proceedings and decisions made by the Court in relation to the Scheme of Amalgamation under the Companies Act, 1956.
TaxTMI 