Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether payments made for purchase of licensed software from non-resident suppliers constituted royalty under section 9(1)(vi) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 so as to attract deduction of tax at source under section 195 and consequential liability under section 201(1) and section 201(1A).
Analysis: The Tribunal followed the jurisdictional High Court decision holding that, on the terms of the software licence arrangement, what was transferred was not a mere sale of a copyrighted article but a licence to use the software coupled with the right to copy, download and store it for internal business use. The Tribunal treated this as a transfer of part of the copyright and held that the payment fell within the expanded meaning of royalty under section 9(1)(vi). Once the payment was treated as royalty, the payer was obliged to deduct tax at source under section 195, and failure to do so attracted the consequences of section 201(1) and section 201(1A).
Conclusion: The payment for licensed software was held to be royalty and the assessee was liable to deduct tax at source; the additions and demand under section 201 were sustained.
Ratio Decidendi: A payment for a software licence that permits use of the software by copying, downloading or storing it for business purposes constitutes royalty where the transaction involves transfer of rights in copyright and not merely sale of a copyrighted article.