1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available
2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New: Section-Wise Filter ✕
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available
2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Court Grants Tea Bush Exemption, Rejects Rubber Trees</h1> The court granted exemption for tea bushes under the Wealth-tax Act, allowing the deduction of the value of 'two leaves and bud' as a growing crop. ... Exemptions, Wealth Tax Issues:1. Characterization of tea bushes as growing crops for exemption under Wealth-tax Act.2. Exemption of rubber trees from wealth tax under section 5(1)(viiia) of the Wealth-tax Act.Analysis:The judgment pertains to the characterization of tea bushes and rubber trees for exemption under the Wealth-tax Act. The court considered whether the 'two leaves and bud' from tea bushes, used in producing black tea, can be classified as growing crops. The assessing authority had previously treated the value of the leaves plucked as a deduction. However, the authority erroneously included the entire value of the tea bushes in the net wealth of the assessee, rejecting the exemption claim. The court held that the value of the leaves should be deducted, as they constitute a growing crop, thus granting the exemption for tea bushes.Regarding rubber trees, the court dismissed the argument to deduct the value of latex produced from the trees from the net wealth. The court emphasized that this claim was not raised at any prior stage of the proceedings and cannot be entertained. The assessing authority's decision, upheld by the appellate authorities and the Tribunal, that rubber plants do not qualify as growing crops was deemed correct and not subject to interference.Consequently, the court directed the assessing authority to recalculate the net wealth by deducting the value of the 'two leaves and bud' as standing crop from the assessee's assets. The court declined to answer the first question regarding tea bushes as the deduction was granted, and ruled in favor of the Department for the second question concerning rubber trees' exemption from wealth tax under section 5(1)(viiia) of the Wealth-tax Act.The judgment concluded by ordering the forwarding of a copy of the judgment to the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Cochin Bench for further action.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
