Manufacturer not liable for penalty under Central Excise Act for availing CENVAT credit.

The Tribunal found no contravention of rules or intent to evade duty by the appellant, a manufacturer of motor vehicle parts, who availed CENVAT credit on inputs. Despite failure to produce evidence of processed inputs, the penalty under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944 was waived due to prompt credit reversal and lack of evasion intent. The duty and interest were upheld, and the appeal was disposed of in favor of the appellant.

---

---

Issues: Appeal against penalty under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944

1. Issue: Waiver of penalty under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944.

Analysis: The appellant, a manufacturer of motor vehicle parts, availed CENVAT credit on inputs sent to a job-worker under Rule 4(5)(a) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. Failure to produce evidence of receiving processed inputs led to a duty demand, interest, and penalty under Section 11AC. The appellant argued no intention to evade duty as credit was reversed promptly. The Tribunal noted Rule 4(5)(a) entitlement to credit on input receipt, determining no duty evasion intent. Consequently, the penalty was waived, but duty and interest were upheld.

2. Judgment: The Tribunal, after considering the submissions and records, found no contravention of rules or duty evasion intent by the appellant. As the duty and interest were paid and no deliberate wrongdoing was established, the penalty under Section 11AC was dropped. The appeal was disposed of with this decision.

---