Harmonious construction of exemption provisos confines the limitation to the life-insurance clause only.

The provisos to section 10(1) of the Kerala Agricultural Income-tax Act were construed as limiting only clause (e), not clauses (a), (c) or (d). Reading the provisos harmoniously and in light of section 15 of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, the court treated clause (e) as the only part of section 10(1) dealing with the same life-insurance-related exemption field. Because the other clauses operate on distinct subjects, the first proviso and the further limitation in the second proviso were held to confine only the exemption under clause (e).

---

---

Issues: Whether the provisos to section 10(1) of the Kerala Agricultural Income-tax Act apply only to clause (e) of that sub-section or to all the clauses in section 10(1).

Analysis: The provisos were read together and in the context of section 15 of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, which is the reference point for the limitation on the exemption. The scheme of section 10(1) shows that clauses (a), (c) and (d) operate on different subjects and are outside the limited field addressed by the provisos, while clause (e) alone deals with the same kind of life-insurance-related exemption that is linked to section 15 of the 1922 Act. On a harmonious construction, the first proviso and the further limitation in the second proviso were held to regulate only the exemption under clause (e).

Conclusion: The provisos to section 10(1) apply only to clause (e) and not to the other clauses.

---