Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the subscription fee paid for access to an online website was royalty and liable to tax deduction at source, and whether the appellate order deleting the TDS liability could be sustained.
Analysis: The payment was made for subscription to a website containing information available only to subscribers. The appellate authority had followed an earlier Tribunal view treating similar database access payments as not constituting royalty. That foundation no longer survived because the earlier view had been reversed by the jurisdictional High Court, which held that access to a database may amount to a licence to use copyright and therefore attract royalty treatment. Since the appellate authority had not returned a specific finding on the correct legal character of the payment in the light of the later binding decision, the order could not be sustained.
Conclusion: The matter was remitted to the appellate authority for fresh decision in accordance with the binding High Court ruling and other relevant authorities.