Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Tribunal's direction to allow relief under section 80K only after ascertaining that the company was entitled to deduction under section 80J was legally justified, and whether the question referred under section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, arose from the Tribunal's order.
Analysis: The deduction claimed under section 80K was dependent upon the company's entitlement to the benefit of deduction under section 80J. Unless that foundational fact was first established, the assessee's claim for deduction could not be allowed. The Tribunal's direction merely required such ascertainment before relief was granted, and the court found no error in that approach. In view of the nature of the Tribunal's order, the referred question was treated as not arising from it.
Conclusion: The Tribunal's direction was held to be perfectly legal and justified, and the question referred was declined to be answered.