TaxTMI Login
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful) ✕
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Just a moment...
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful) ✕ Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether cash payments made by way of commission could be treated as perquisites so as to attract disallowance under section 40(a)(v) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Analysis: The payment in question was found to be a cash payment. The controlling principle applied was that a payment can be treated as a perquisite only if it is something other than a cash payment made pursuant to a contract of service. On that basis, the disallowance made by the Income-tax Officer could not be sustained.
Conclusion: The question was answered in the affirmative, holding that the Tribunal was right in deleting the disallowance, and the issue was decided against the Revenue.
TaxTMI 
