Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether duty foregone could be recovered from a transferee-importer who had imported goods against DEPB scrips purchased in good faith, after the scrips were later cancelled for fraud committed by the original holder, and whether the extended limitation period under the Customs Act, 1962 could be invoked.
Analysis: The DEPB scrips were valid when used for import and were cancelled only later after the department discovered that the original holder had obtained them on the basis of forged documents. There was no allegation or evidence that the transferee-importer was a party to the fraud or had knowledge of it. Applying the principle that a licence or similar transfer right obtained by fraud is voidable and remains effective until avoided in the manner prescribed by law, the imported goods could not be treated as imported without authority merely because the original holder's fraud came to light later. On the same reasoning, the transferee's bona fide rights could not be defeated, and the ingredients for invoking the extended period on the basis of misstatement, suppression, or collusion were absent.
Conclusion: Duty could not be demanded from the transferee-importer, and the extended period under the proviso to Section 28(1) of the Customs Act, 1962 was not invocable.