Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the order treating the assessee as in default and levying interest under sections 201(1) and 201(1A) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was vitiated for want of a speaking order and proper computation, and whether the matter required remand for fresh consideration.
Analysis: The order passed by the Assessing Officer was found to be cryptic and lacking a proper speaking basis. The appellate authority had directed recalculation of tax after giving credit for tax paid by the deductees, but had not addressed the basic defect in the Assessing Officer's order. The Tribunal relied on the requirement that computation and demand must be properly recorded and that the assessee must be given an effective opportunity before a valid determination is made. In these circumstances, the Tribunal held that the matter should be restored to the Assessing Officer for passing a speaking order after following the proper procedure and affording hearing to the assessee.
Conclusion: The impugned appellate order was set aside and the matter was remanded to the Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication, with directions to pass a speaking order after giving the assessee an opportunity of hearing.
Ratio Decidendi: A TDS default determination must be supported by a speaking order containing proper computation and reasons, and where the order is cryptic, the matter is liable to be remanded for fresh decision after affording hearing.