Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellant was entitled to waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery in respect of the duty, interest and penalties confirmed on the ground that the ready mix concrete was not manufactured and used at the construction site within the meaning of the exemption notification.
Analysis: The Batching Plants were installed within the project sites and inside the boundary walls of the construction sites. The size of the project area and movement of ready mix concrete from one part of the same site to another did not alter the fact that manufacture took place at the site of construction. The notification required manufacture of concrete mix at the site of construction for use in construction work at such site and did not prescribe any spatial restriction within the site. On the materials placed, the appellant had shown a strong prima facie case that the exemption condition was satisfied.
Conclusion: The appellant was entitled to complete waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery during pendency of the appeals.