Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether payments made for purchase or licence of software from non-resident suppliers were royalty, requiring deduction of tax at source under section 195 and attracting liability under sections 201(1) and 201(1A).
Analysis: The appeal was decided by following the jurisdictional High Court decision in the assessee's own case on identical facts. The payment for software was held to involve a licence to use copyright in the software, including the right to make a copy for installation and backup, and therefore to fall within the expression royalty. Once the payments were characterised as royalty and income chargeable in India in the hands of the non-resident recipients, the remitter was obliged to deduct tax at source. The consequential liability as assessee in default and the interest levy were upheld.
Conclusion: The issue was decided against the assessee and in favour of the Revenue.
Ratio Decidendi: Payment for software that conveys a right to use copyright, including copying for installation or backup, constitutes royalty and triggers the obligation to deduct tax at source under section 195.