Successful appeal allows full credit on capital goods under specific heading, setting aside order for excess payment.

The appellant successfully appealed against the order directing payment of excess credit availed on capital goods, along with interest and penalty. The court held that as the appellant had availed credit only on goods falling under a specific heading as per Rule 4(2)(b) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, they were entitled to claim 100% credit. Consequently, the impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed with consequential relief, with the stay application disposed of accordingly.

---

---

Issues: Appeal against excess credit availed on capital goods.

Analysis:
The appellant filed an appeal against the order directing them to pay excess credit availed on capital goods along with interest and penalty. The appellant had purchased various capital goods and availed 100% Cenvat credit on them. However, a show-cause notice was issued for availing excess credit, leading to confirmation of demand, interest, and penalty by the authorities. The appellant contended that Rule 4 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 allowed them to claim 100% credit on the capital goods falling under a specific heading. On the other hand, the Revenue argued that since the goods were classified as capital goods in the appellant's records, they were not entitled to claim 100% credit. After detailed hearings, the judge noted that Rule 4(2)(b) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 allowed for 100% credit on goods under a particular heading. As the appellant had availed credit only on goods falling under that specific heading, they were entitled to the full credit amount as per the rule. Consequently, the impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed with consequential relief. The stay application was also disposed of accordingly.

---