Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellant was entitled to a single Central Excise Registration for Unit I and Unit II situated in the same industrial estate.
Analysis: The request for single registration was examined with reference to Chapter 2, Para 3.2 of the C.B.E. & C. Excise Manual (Supplementary Instructions, 2005). The units were located within the same industrial estate and the mere fact that they were not adjacent or were separated by internal lanes and sheds did not justify a rigid rejection. The decision emphasised that registration matters should be approached pragmatically, especially where no prejudice is shown to Revenue and the request is otherwise legally reasonable.
Conclusion: The appellant was entitled to a single Central Excise Registration for both units, and the request could not be denied on the stated grounds.