Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, for goods cleared to a sister unit for captive consumption in manufacture of final products, the assessable value was to be determined by applying Cost Accounting Standard 4 and whether Board Circular No. 692/08/2003-CX dated 13-2-2003 was merely clarificatory and retrospective in effect.
Analysis: The dispute concerned inclusion of marketing, distribution and advertisement expenses in the assessable value of captively used goods. The Board circular clarified that assessable value is to be arrived at by following CAS-4. The Court relied on the settled position that the circular was clarificatory in nature and therefore applicable retrospectively. On that basis, the correct method for valuation of goods captively used by a sister unit was held to be CAS-4.
Conclusion: The assessable value had to be determined by applying CAS-4, and the Board circular was retrospective and clarificatory. The Revenue's appeal failed.