Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether marketing, advertising, selling and distribution expenses were includible in the cost of production of captively consumed intermediate goods for valuation under Rule 6(b)(ii) of the Central Excise (Valuation) Rules, 1975.
Analysis: The valuation of captively consumed goods was to be determined on the basis of cost of production in accordance with accepted cost-accounting principles. The settled position applied by the Tribunal was that only elements actually going into manufacture or production, such as direct labour, direct material, direct manufacturing cost and factory overheads, form part of the cost of production. Expenses incurred after manufacture, including advertising, marketing, insurance and other selling or distribution expenses, do not enter the production cost of intermediate goods. The Board's circular of 2003 also required computation strictly in accordance with CAS-4 principles, and those principles did not support inclusion of the disputed expenses.
Conclusion: Marketing and distribution expenses were not includible in the cost of production of captively consumed goods, and the revenue's challenge failed.