Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether pre-deposit of duty, interest and penalty should be waived and recovery stayed pending disposal of the appeal.
Analysis: The appeal involved a claim for waiver of pre-deposit in a duty dispute arising from denial of exemption under the notification. The amount in dispute had already been deposited in an escrow account, and the earlier order of the Gauhati High Court had held that the revenue stood adequately protected and that no further pre-deposit should be insisted upon. Following that approach, the Tribunal treated the existing deposit as sufficient protection during pendency of the appeal.
Conclusion: Pre-deposit of duty, interest and penalty was waived and recovery of the same was stayed during pendency of the appeal.
Final Conclusion: The matter was kept pending for regular hearing, with interim protection granted to the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the disputed duty is already secured and the revenue's interest is adequately protected, further pre-deposit need not be insisted upon and recovery may be stayed pending appeal.