Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellant was entitled to rebate claim under Notification No. 05/2006-CE(NT) dated 14.3.2006 despite non-compliance with the prescribed conditions and procedure, including the requirement relating to input-output norms.
Analysis: The rebate claim was examined against the conditions of the notification. It was found that the prescribed input-output norms were not adhered to, the required conditions of the notification were not fulfilled, and the appellant failed to establish whether Cenvat credit had been availed. The claim application was also found deficient in material respects. In the absence of persuasive challenge to these findings, the grounds raised did not justify grant of rebate.
Conclusion: The rebate claim was not sustainable and the appeal failed.