Just a moment...
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the goods, being fried rings made from rice, wheat and potato flour and sold as ready-to-eat snacks, were classifiable under sub-heading 2108.99 as food preparations/Namkeens and eligible for exemption under Notification No. 4/97-C.E., or whether they fell under Heading 19.02 as pasta.
Analysis: The product was found to be a snack prepared from dry pellets fried in oil, salted and flavoured, and therefore commercially and functionally distinct from pasta. The Tribunal noted that similar goods had already been classified under sub-heading 2108.99 in an earlier decision involving comparable snack products, and no stay or reversal of that decision was shown. On that basis, the goods were treated as Namkeens covered by the relevant exemption entry in Notification No. 4/97-C.E.
Conclusion: The goods were correctly classified under sub-heading 2108.99 and were entitled to exemption under Notification No. 4/97-C.E.; the Revenue's challenge failed.