Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI OCR

Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :
        Central Excise

        2012 (9) TMI 170 - AT - Central Excise

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Excess electricity and corroborative records can justify pre-deposit in clandestine removal disputes, but weak input estimates may not. In clandestine removal matters, excess electricity consumption, when supported by corroborative records such as bills, forms, private records, supplier ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Excess electricity and corroborative records can justify pre-deposit in clandestine removal disputes, but weak input estimates may not.

                          In clandestine removal matters, excess electricity consumption, when supported by corroborative records such as bills, forms, private records, supplier correspondence, balance-sheet data and admissions, was treated as sufficient to make out a prima facie case for demanding pre-deposit and declining stay. The absence of proof of unaccounted raw material, transport or buyer records did not, by itself, displace that inference. By contrast, where the demand against Shree Steel Castings Pvt. Ltd. rested on a melter's estimate of silico-manganese consumption per tonne of ingots, the foundation was considered weak and unreliable, so a prima facie case for waiver of pre-deposit was found.




                          Issues: (i) whether, in a batch of stay applications concerning alleged clandestine manufacture and removal of M.S. ingots, excess electricity consumption supported by surrounding circumstances furnished a prima facie case for demanding pre-deposit and refusing stay; and (ii) whether the case of Shree Steel Castings Pvt. Ltd., where the demand was based on consumption of silico-manganese alloy, disclosed a prima facie case for waiver of pre-deposit.

                          Issue (i): whether, in a batch of stay applications concerning alleged clandestine manufacture and removal of M.S. ingots, excess electricity consumption supported by surrounding circumstances furnished a prima facie case for demanding pre-deposit and refusing stay.

                          Analysis: The allegations were not founded on electricity consumption alone in the abstract. The records referred to electricity bills, G-7 forms, private records, correspondence with furnace suppliers, balance-sheet data, admissions in some cases, and other corroborative circumstances showing suppressed production. The burden initially lay on the Revenue to show a credible basis for clandestine removal, and that burden was treated as discharged by evidence of excess consumption of electricity and related supporting material. The absence of proof of unaccounted raw material, transport, or buyer records did not, by itself, negate the prima facie inference where clandestine activity was alleged. The earlier decision relied upon by the assessees was distinguished because it proceeded only on a technical opinion without corroboration, whereas the present matters contained additional evidence.

                          Conclusion: A prima facie case was made out against the assessees in these matters, and pre-deposit was warranted in the prescribed proportions.

                          Issue (ii): whether the case of Shree Steel Castings Pvt. Ltd., where the demand was based on consumption of silico-manganese alloy, disclosed a prima facie case for waiver of pre-deposit.

                          Analysis: The demand against this assessee rested on a melter's statement regarding the quantity of silico-manganese allegedly used per tonne of ingots. That basis was questioned as being inconsistent with technical standards and was also supported by a later appellate order that had not been shown to be stayed. The Tribunal treated the foundation of this demand as comparatively weak and accepted that a demand built on the alleged consumption of a minor input, without a reliable and persuasive basis, did not stand on the same footing as the electricity-based cases.

                          Conclusion: Shree Steel Castings Pvt. Ltd. made out a prima facie case for waiver of pre-deposit, and its stay application was allowed.

                          Final Conclusion: The batch was disposed of by directing pre-deposit against all assessees except Shree Steel Castings Pvt. Ltd., while granting stay in respect of the latter on the strength of its prima facie case. Compliance with the ordered deposits would secure waiver and stay for the balance amounts.

                          Ratio Decidendi: In clandestine removal cases, excess consumption of electricity or other input, when supported by corroborative circumstances, can justify a prima facie demand and pre-deposit; but where the demand is founded on an unreliable estimate based on a minor input, waiver may be granted.


                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found