Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellants were entitled to waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery in proceedings relating to service tax demand under Notification No. 32/2004-S.T.
Analysis: The demand had been raised by denying the benefit of the notification on the ground that the required declaration was not stated on the consignment notes. The record showed that a general declaration had been filed stating that credit on input and capital goods had not been availed and that benefit of Notification No. 12/2003 had not been taken. A Board circular also clarified that such a general declaration was sufficient for availing the notification benefit. On that basis, a prima facie case was made out for interim relief.
Conclusion: The appellants were entitled to waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery during pendency of the appeals.