Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Tribunal was right in directing deposit of Rs. 50 lakhs as a pre-condition for hearing the appeal on merits.
Analysis: The appeal arose from an order on waiver of pre-deposit in a central excise dispute involving alleged wrongful availment of cenvat credit. Having regard to the nature of the controversy and the quantum involved, the Court modified the Tribunal's order and directed a partial deposit instead of the full amount demanded.
Conclusion: The direction to deposit Rs. 50 lakhs was modified, and the appellant was required to deposit 50% of the cenvat credit amount in two equal instalments as a condition for hearing of the appeal.