Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :
        Central Excise

        2012 (9) TMI 26 - HC - Central Excise

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Court Upholds Assessee's Right to Concessional Duty Rate Under Notification The court ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the denial of the concessional rate of duty once clearances exceed Rs. 75 Lakhs under Notification ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
                        Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.

                          Court Upholds Assessee's Right to Concessional Duty Rate Under Notification

                          The court ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the denial of the concessional rate of duty once clearances exceed Rs. 75 Lakhs under Notification No. 1/1993-Central Excise is illegal and contrary to the notification's intent. The court emphasized that the benefit is intended for small-scale units with total clearances below Rs. 2 Crores, and once these conditions are met, the assessee can avail the concessional duty rate up to Rs. 75 Lakhs in clearances. The decision aligned with supporting small-scale units meeting the notification's criteria, resulting in a favorable outcome for the assessee against the revenue in all references.




                          Issues:
                          1. Interpretation of Notification No. 1/1993-Central Excise regarding deemed modvat credit eligibility.
                          2. Applicability of concessional rate of duty under the notification based on total turnover.
                          3. Dispute over entitlement to exemption under the notification if clearances exceed Rs. 75 Lakhs but are less than Rs. 2 Crores.

                          Issue 1: Interpretation of Notification No. 1/1993-Central Excise:
                          The judgment revolves around the interpretation of Notification No. 1/1993-Central Excise, specifically concerning the availability of deemed modvat credit to re-rollers even after surpassing the monetary limit of Rs. 75 Lakhs in clearances. The assessee, a Small Scale Industry (SSI) unit, availed deemed credit for re-rollable materials to manufacture and clear their products at a concessional duty rate. The assessing authority issued a notice to pay duty as the total turnover exceeded Rs. 75 Lakhs, questioning the continuation of the deemed credit. The Commissioner of Customs and Excise initially ruled in favor of the assessee, but the Tribunal's decision varied for different appeals, leading to references being made.

                          Issue 2: Applicability of Concessional Rate of Duty Based on Total Turnover:
                          The critical question was whether the benefit of the concessional rate of duty under the notification should be denied once the total turnover exceeds Rs. 75 Lakhs. The High Court analyzed the notification's provisions, emphasizing that the benefit is intended for small-scale units with total clearances below Rs. 2 Crores. The notification outlines specific requirements for eligibility, including the total clearances being less than Rs. 2 Crores. It further clarifies that once these conditions are met, the assessee can avail the concessional duty rate up to Rs. 75 Lakhs in clearances, divided into three slabs. The Court deemed the Larger Bench's view, denying the benefit once clearances exceed Rs. 75 Lakhs, as illegal and contrary to the notification's intent, ruling in favor of the assessee.

                          Issue 3: Dispute Over Exemption Entitlement Within Specified Clearances Range:
                          The judgment referred to precedents from the High Courts of Himachal Pradesh and Punjab and Haryana, highlighting that manufacturers with clearances below Rs. 2 Crores are entitled to the notification's benefits, even if their clearances exceed Rs. 75 Lakhs. The Court reiterated that the notification aims to support manufacturers meeting the specified criteria, emphasizing that the total clearances being less than Rs. 2 Crores is the primary condition for eligibility. The decision favored the assessee, emphasizing that the denial of concessional rate once clearances surpass Rs. 75 Lakhs contradicts the notification's provisions. Consequently, the Court ruled in favor of the assessee and against the revenue in all references, aligning with the interpretation supporting small-scale units meeting the notification's criteria.
                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found