Lubricating oil classification dispute sent back for fresh adjudication after unconsidered evidence and submissions were identified.

Classification of lubricating oils under rival Central Excise Tariff headings required reconsideration because the lower authorities decided the dispute mainly on alleged defects in sample testing procedure and did not examine other material on record. The test-house certificate, affidavit, and supporting classification documents were left unconsidered. A fresh adjudication was therefore directed, with both sides given liberty to file documents and the assessee to receive a reasonable opportunity of hearing.

---

---

Issues: Whether the classification of the lubricating oils under the Central Excise Tariff required fresh adjudication in view of the evidences and submissions not considered by the lower authorities.

Analysis: The dispute concerned classification of the goods under rival tariff headings. The lower authorities had decided the matter principally on the ground that the proper procedure for drawal of samples for testing was not followed. The record showed that other material, including the test-house certificate, affidavit, and supporting classification material, had not been examined while deciding the classification dispute. As the matter required consideration of all evidence on record, a fresh decision was warranted.

Conclusion: The matter was remanded to the lower adjudicating authority for fresh decision after considering all submissions and evidence, with liberty to both sides to adduce documents and with reasonable opportunity of hearing to the assessee.

---