Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether depreciation on a motor car acquired before the previous year had to be computed on its actual cost to the assessee where no depreciation had been claimed or actually allowed in earlier assessment years.
Analysis: Under Section 5 of the Agricultural Income-tax Act, 1950, depreciation is allowed on the written down value of eligible assets, and for assets acquired before the previous year the written down value is the actual cost to the assessee less such sum as may be prescribed. Rule 13 of the Kerala Agricultural Income-tax Rules, 1951, which speaks of reduction by depreciation actually allowed, was held inapplicable on the facts because the controlling statutory language required a valid prescription for any reduction from actual cost in the case of such assets. In the absence of any prescription showing a different basis, and since no depreciation had in fact been claimed or allowed for the earlier years, the actual cost remained the proper base for depreciation.
Conclusion: The assessee was entitled to depreciation on the actual cost of acquisition of the motor car, and not on a reduced written down value based on unclaimed or unallowed prior depreciation.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the statute fixes actual cost as the basis for assets acquired before the previous year unless a prescribed reduction applies, depreciation cannot be curtailed by treating unclaimed and unallowed prior depreciation as if it had reduced the written down value.