Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2012 (8) TMI 525 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tribunal rules on TDS calculation: Actual rent prevails over book entries The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision in a case involving a dispute over TDS calculation and interest on lease rent. It ruled that TDS should be based ...
                        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                            Tribunal rules on TDS calculation: Actual rent prevails over book entries

                            The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision in a case involving a dispute over TDS calculation and interest on lease rent. It ruled that TDS should be based on the actual agreed-upon rent of Rs. 6 Crores per annum, not the higher amount in the profit and loss account. Emphasizing the importance of real income over book entries, the Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal, highlighting compliance with tax regulations in determining TDS deductions and interest payments under the Income Tax Act.




                            Issues Involved:
                            1. Dispute over the determination of TDS and interest on delayed payment of TDS based on lease rent amount.
                            2. Interpretation of provisions under section 194-I of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
                            3. Assessment of actual lease rent for TDS deduction and interest calculation.
                            4. Consideration of accounting standards and real income for tax deductions.
                            5. Evaluation of the timing of TDS remittance and accounting entries.

                            Analysis:

                            Issue 1: Dispute over TDS Determination and Interest Calculation:
                            The case involved a disagreement between the Revenue and the assessee regarding the amount of TDS to be deducted on lease rent. The Revenue contended that TDS should be calculated on Rs. 9 Crores, while the assessee argued for Rs. 6 Crores. The Revenue also challenged the interest calculation based on the higher amount. The CIT(A) granted partial relief to the assessee, which led to the Revenue appealing before the Tribunal.

                            Issue 2: Interpretation of Section 194-I:
                            The main contention revolved around the interpretation of section 194-I of the Income Tax Act, 1961, which deals with TDS on rent payments. The Revenue argued that TDS should be based on the higher amount provided in the profit and loss account, while the assessee maintained that TDS should be calculated on the actual agreed-upon rent of Rs. 6 Crores per annum.

                            Issue 3: Assessment of Actual Lease Rent for TDS Deduction:
                            The Tribunal analyzed the facts and found that the actual lease rent agreed upon between the assessee and the land lords was Rs. 6 Crores per annum. The Tribunal emphasized that the real income and expenditure should determine the TDS amount, rather than mere book entries. It was established that the assessee had acted in good faith by adding back the entire sum of Rs. 9 Crores to its income and paying tax on the same.

                            Issue 4: Consideration of Accounting Standards and Real Income:
                            The Tribunal highlighted the importance of considering actual lease agreements and real income for tax deductions. It was clarified that the TDS should be based on the agreed-upon rent of Rs. 6 Crores, as reflected in the lease agreement, rather than on a provision made in the books of account for prudence.

                            Issue 5: Evaluation of Timing of TDS Remittance and Accounting Entries:
                            The Tribunal examined the timing of TDS remittance and accounting entries to determine the correct amount for TDS deduction. It was noted that the assessee had reversed the provision for lease rent and remitted TDS on the actual agreed-upon amount after reaching an agreement with the land lords, demonstrating compliance with tax regulations.

                            In conclusion, the Tribunal upheld the order of the CIT(A) and dismissed the Revenue's appeal, emphasizing the importance of considering actual lease agreements and real income for TDS deductions and interest calculations under the Income Tax Act.
                            Full Summary is available for active users!
                            Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                            Topics

                            ActsIncome Tax
                            No Records Found