Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Tribunal's findings on estimated professional income and household expenses were pure findings of fact so that no question of law arose for reference under section 256 of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Analysis: The Tribunal had sustained the additions after appreciating the material on record and had treated the dispute as one concerning estimation of income and expenditure. The court held that appraisal of facts and the conclusion drawn therefrom amounted only to findings of fact. Since the reference application sought reconsideration of those factual determinations, no referable question of law was shown to arise.
Conclusion: The Tribunal was right in holding that no question of law arose for reference, and the application under section 256(2) stood rejected.