Assessment Order Validated Despite Notice Dispute: Active Participation Key

The Tribunal upheld the validity of the assessment order under Section 143(3) despite the dispute over the notice under Section 143(2) service, emphasizing the assessee's active participation in the proceedings as evidence of awareness, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.

---

---

Issues:
Validity of assessment order under Section 143(3) without notice under Section 143(2).

Analysis:

Issue 1: Validity of assessment order under Section 143(3) without notice under Section 143(2)

The appeal was against the order of the CIT(A)-IV for the A.Y.2004-2005. The Tribunal recalled the matter to adjudicate ground no.2, which was left undecided previously. The issue revolved around the validity of the assessment order passed under Section 143(3) without proper notice to the assessee. The assessee, a Marketing Committee, claimed its status as "AOP" and filed for deduction under Section 80P of the Act. The AO issued notices under Section 143(2) and 142(1) and conducted assessment proceedings. The CIT(A) rejected the claim of non-receipt of the notice under Section 143(2) based on the AO's confirmation of issuing the notice. The assessee contended that no concrete evidence proved the receipt of notices. The Tribunal analyzed the facts and concluded that the assessee's participation in hearings and submissions indicated awareness of the proceedings, estopping them from disputing the notice's service. The Tribunal found no perversity in the Revenue authorities' findings and dismissed the appeal, confirming the validity of the assessment order under Section 143(3).

In conclusion, the Tribunal upheld the assessment order's validity under Section 143(3) despite the dispute over the notice under Section 143(2) service, emphasizing the assessee's active participation in the proceedings as evidence of awareness, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.

---