Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the notice under section 143(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was validly served, and whether any substantial question of law arose from the Tribunal's finding cancelling the assessments on that basis.
Analysis: The notice was first served on a person having no concern with the assessee and later sent to an address different from the one furnished by the assessee. On the Tribunal's recorded findings, the service of notice was not in accordance with the assessee's correct address. The validity of service in the given facts was treated as a pure question of fact, and no substantial question of law arose from the Tribunal's order.
Conclusion: The notice was not validly served, the assessments were rightly cancelled, and the appeals failed.