TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Join Channel
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether capital gains arising from the proposed sale of shares by a Mauritius tax resident were chargeable to tax in India under the India-Mauritius Double Taxation Avoidance Convention; (ii) Whether the buyer of the shares was required to deduct tax at source under section 195 of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Issue (i): Whether capital gains arising from the proposed sale of shares by a Mauritius tax resident were chargeable to tax in India under the India-Mauritius Double Taxation Avoidance Convention.
Analysis: The applicant produced a valid tax residency certificate from Mauritius and asserted that it was a Mauritius resident for treaty purposes. The transfer related to shares covered by paragraph 4 of Article 13 of the India-Mauritius DTAC. Objections based on alleged routing of investments, control from India, and the contention that the treaty would not apply unless capital gains were actually taxed in Mauritius were rejected in view of the binding effect of the Supreme Court decision relied upon.
Conclusion: The capital gains from the proposed sale of shares were not chargeable to tax in India.
Issue (ii): Whether the buyer of the shares was required to deduct tax at source under section 195 of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Analysis: Since the capital gains arising to the applicant were held not to be taxable in India, no income chargeable to tax in India arose from the transaction. On that basis, the withholding obligation was not attracted.
Conclusion: The buyer of the shares had no obligation to deduct tax at source under section 195.
Final Conclusion: The advance ruling held that the proposed share sale by the Mauritius resident applicant did not attract Indian capital gains tax and that no withholding obligation arose on the purchaser.
Ratio Decidendi: A Mauritius resident holding a valid tax residency certificate is entitled to the treaty benefit under Article 13 of the India-Mauritius DTAC for capital gains on shares, and where no income is chargeable to tax in India, tax withholding under section 195 is not required.
TaxTMI 
