TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>ITAT dismisses Revenue's appeals for assessment years 2003-06, allows bad debt claim, upholds service charge deletion.</h1> <h3>ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Versus M/s BOBCARDS LTD</h3> ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Versus M/s BOBCARDS LTD - TMI Issues:1. Disallowance of bad debts.2. Deletion of service charges.3. Disallowance of TDS on payments for services.Issue 1: Disallowance of bad debts:The Revenue filed appeals against the orders of Ld. CIT(A)-4, Mumbai for assessment years 2003-04 to 2005-06. The AO disallowed bad debts claimed by the assessee, citing that a non-finance company cannot claim bad debts. However, the Ld. CIT(A) directed the AO to allow the claim based on the amended provisions of Sec. 36(1)(VII), stating that only writing off the debt in the books is required. The ITAT upheld the Ld. CIT(A)'s decision, noting that the AO did not provide reasons for disallowance and that similar additions in earlier years were deleted by the Ld. CIT(A), which the Revenue accepted. The ITAT allowed the claim based on precedent and the amended law.Issue 2: Deletion of service charges:The AO added service charges to the total income as the company changed its accounting method from mercantile to cash system, not accepting the change. The Ld. CIT(A) deleted the addition, considering RBI guidelines for non-banking finance companies to recognize interest income on non-performing assets (NPA) on a cash basis. The ITAT upheld the Ld. CIT(A)'s decision, stating that the company must follow RBI guidelines and recognized interest income only on actual receipt basis, confirming no error in the decision.Issue 3: Disallowance of TDS on payments for services:The AO disallowed TDS deducted on payments to Visa/Master Card International, claiming it was not an expenditure for the business. The Ld. CIT(A) allowed the claim based on precedent cases where such payments were considered as part of the agreement and a discharge of liability. The ITAT dismissed the Revenue's appeal, citing decisions of High Courts that similar payments were in discharge of liabilities as per agreements. The ITAT upheld the Ld. CIT(A)'s decision, dismissing the Revenue's ground.In conclusion, the ITAT dismissed all appeals filed by the Revenue for the assessment years 2003-04, 2004-05, and 2005-06, as common grounds and issues were involved in all three appeals. The decisions were based on legal interpretations, precedent cases, and adherence to RBI guidelines for non-banking finance companies.
TaxTMI 