Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the trust was entitled to the benefit of proviso (iv) to Section 164(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 so as to be assessed at the normal rate applicable to an association of persons instead of the maximum marginal rate.
Analysis: The trust had already succeeded before the Tribunal on the ground that benefits extended to employees included benefits extended to their dependent family members, and therefore the trust fell within the exception carved out by proviso (iv) to Section 164(1). The order of the Tribunal had not been challenged by the Revenue. In that situation, the assessment orders adopting the maximum marginal rate could not stand and the assessing authority was required to give effect to the Tribunal's finding while recomputing the liability.
Conclusion: The trust was entitled to the benefit of proviso (iv) to Section 164(1), and the assessment was to be recomputed at the normal rate applicable to an association of persons.
Final Conclusion: The impugned assessment orders were set aside and the matter was remitted for fresh computation of tax liability in accordance with the Tribunal's ruling, giving the assessee the benefit of the statutory exception.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the Revenue does not challenge the Tribunal's finding that a trust falls within proviso (iv) to Section 164(1), the assessment must conform to that finding and cannot continue to apply the maximum marginal rate.