Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By: ?
Even if Sort by Date is selected, exact match will be shown on the top.
RelevanceDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Interpretation of service tax exemption for services to SEZ clarified by Tribunal, strict eligibility criteria emphasized</h1> <h3>DHL LEMUIR LOGISTICS PVT LTD Versus COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, MUMBAI</h3> DHL LEMUIR LOGISTICS PVT LTD Versus COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, MUMBAI - 2012 (284) E.L.T. 505 (Tri. - Mumbai), 2012 (28) S.T.R. 135 (Tri. - Mumbai) Issues:- Applicability of service tax exemption under Notification No.4/2004-ST for services provided to a Special Economic Zone (SEZ).- Interpretation of the exemption notification in relation to the SEZ Act, 2005 and SEZ Rules, 2006.- Consideration of judgments in similar cases and their relevance to the present matter.- Legal principles governing the interpretation of exemption notifications in taxation laws.- Requirement of pre-deposit of dues adjudged and stay application.Issue 1: Applicability of service tax exemption under Notification No.4/2004-ST for services provided to a Special Economic Zone (SEZ).The appellant, engaged in various services, claimed exemption under Notification No.4/2004-ST for services provided to a unit in a Special Economic Zone (SEZ). The demand was raised by the Commissioner for service tax, interest, and penalties. The appellant argued that they were entitled to the exemption under the SEZ Act, 2005 and SEZ Rules, 2006, along with reliance on specific judgments to support their stance.Issue 2: Interpretation of the exemption notification in relation to the SEZ Act, 2005 and SEZ Rules, 2006.The Tribunal analyzed the legal provisions and held that the exemption notification must be strictly interpreted based on its language. The Tribunal referred to various judicial precedents emphasizing strict interpretation of exemption notifications in tax laws. It was concluded that the exemption is applicable only if services are consumed within the SEZ, and the notification cannot be read in conjunction with subsequent legislations like the SEZ Act, 2005 or SEZ Rules, 2006.Issue 3: Consideration of judgments in similar cases and their relevance to the present matter.The Tribunal discussed the judgments cited by both parties, highlighting that the principles of statutory interpretation laid down by the apex court are binding. The Tribunal differentiated the present case from the cited judgments, emphasizing that the benefit of exemption is contingent on services being consumed within the SEZ, as explicitly mentioned in the notification.Issue 4: Legal principles governing the interpretation of exemption notifications in taxation laws.The Tribunal extensively quoted various judicial decisions to establish the principles guiding the interpretation of exemption notifications. Emphasizing strict interpretation and the importance of clear language in exemptions, the Tribunal applied these principles to the present case to determine the eligibility for the claimed exemption under Notification No.4/2004-ST.Issue 5: Requirement of pre-deposit of dues adjudged and stay application.The Tribunal, after considering the arguments and legal precedents, ruled that the appellant failed to establish a case for a full waiver of the pre-deposit of dues adjudged. A pre-deposit of Rs.1.00 Crore was directed within a specified timeframe, with the balance of dues waived subject to compliance. The Tribunal highlighted the need to balance the interests of the appellant and the revenue authorities in granting a stay.In conclusion, the Tribunal's judgment clarified the interpretation of the exemption notification, emphasizing the necessity of services being consumed within the SEZ for eligibility. The ruling also addressed the pre-deposit requirement and the considerations involved in granting a stay application.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found