Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the respondent company is liable to be wound up under Section 433(e) of the Companies Act, 1956 on the ground of inability to pay its debts/default in repayment of loan.
Analysis: The petitioner advanced a loan to the respondent under a loan agreement with scheduled monthly instalments. The petitioner produced the loan application, agreement and a statutory notice, and established that despite payments in part the respondents defaulted, leading to an outstanding sum. The petition was admitted on prima facie material and published as directed; the respondents did not contest the claim or appear before the Court. On the materials before the Court the indebtedness and failure to discharge the liability remained undisputed. Under Section 433(e) of the Companies Act, 1956, inability to pay debts is a recognised ground for winding up. Given the undisputed default, the Court concluded that the respondent company was commercially insolvent and unable to pay its debts, warranting winding up and appointment of the Official Liquidator to realise assets and recover dues. The Court also directed deposit for initial liquidation expenses and publication of the winding up order.
Conclusion: The petition under Section 433(e) of the Companies Act, 1956 is allowed; the respondent company is ordered to be wound up, the Official Liquidator is appointed, the petitioner is to deposit initial liquidation expenses and to publish the winding up order.