Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Settlement Commission could reopen concluded settlement proceedings by invoking the rectification power under Section 154 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 and withdraw the waiver of interest under Sections 234B and 234C.
Analysis: The dispute turned on the effect of the Supreme Court's ruling that, once an application for settlement is allowed to proceed, further charge of interest under Section 234B is not permissible and the power under Section 154 cannot be used to reopen the settled matter. The impugned order and the consequential demand notices were thus inconsistent with the settled legal position governing finality of settlement proceedings and interest liability.
Conclusion: The reopening of the concluded settlement proceedings was impermissible, and the withdrawal of waiver of interest under Sections 234B and 234C could not be sustained.