Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a show cause notice issued under Section 73 of the Finance Act, 1994 before the amendment of 10.09.2004 could sustain a demand against a recipient of services liable to file returns under Section 71A of the Finance Act, 1994.
Analysis: The liability in question arose from a category of assessees governed by Section 71A, while Section 73 was amended only from 10.09.2004 to bring such violations within its scope. The earlier notices issued before that amendment were not covered by the unamended Section 73. The Tribunal followed the binding Supreme Court view that, unless Section 71A was incorporated into Section 73, no demand could be raised for such non-compliance. The later amendment and decisions rendered in respect of notices issued after the amendment did not assist the Revenue on the present facts.
Conclusion: The show cause notice issued in April 2004 was not sustainable, and the demand was rightly set aside.